Science.....? Or religion.....?

I spent a lot of years as a scientist, and also as a teacher, attempting to explain to others what science is, and what science is about. So it has been with considerable interest that I have followed the events in Pennsylvania. The question is whether the idea of Intelligent Design should be taught in science classes as an alternative to the theory of evolution. First of all, it seems so obvious to me that change and evolution are such a basic part of the world I live in that I wonder why anyone would be in opposition to teaching the theory of evolution. The idea of God and the relation of God to the world is such a complex issue that it is impossible in a short space to say anything meaningful. In fact, people throughout history have been explaining their ideas of God, and debating with others what God is, and in fact, whether God, who is infinite, can be understood by us finite beings. I find that a fascinating enterprise and greatly enjoy discussing the issue, where such discussion belongs.... in the church and in religious discussion. However, in the science class, I hope my children will learn what science really is, and will learn the background of people who have used this technique to probe this world which we are privileged to be a part of. So I was very happy to hear the judge say that the idea of Intelligent Design is not science and therefore should not be taught in science classes. I have no problem with people who wish to consider the idea of Intelligent Design. However, let us keep the discussion where it belongs, in the church, and not in science classes in our public schools.